Parliamentary Panel Says CUET's MCQ Format Not Fit for Disciplines Centred on Independent Thinking

18 June 2026 | The Wire

A parliamentary standing committee has raised questions over the Common University Entrance Test (CUET), arguing that its multiple-choice questions format is not an adequate measure for social science-related fields and may hinder institutions such as the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from ensuring socio-economic and regional diversity in admissions. In a report submitted to Rajya Sabha chairman on Tuesday (June 16), the committee on education, women, children, youth and sports said the format was “ill-suited for humanities and social sciences disciplines which are definitionally centred on independent, subjective thinking,” reported Times of India.

The current document is a follow-up on the recommendations made by the committee in its 364th report on demands for grants, 2025-26, which dealt with the Department of High Education. The committee, headed by Congress MP Digvijay Singh, noted that the test was implemented in the 2022-23 academic year with an aim to reduce pressure on students and universities alike and to place candidates graduating from different boards on an equal footing. However, the MCQ-based format posed concerns in this regard. The panel called for a review of both the quality of the CUET question papers and the design of the exam in line with the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020…

Click here to read the complete article

Previous
Previous

Why a Federal Model and Not Computer-Based Test May Fix NEET

Next
Next

Religious Ritual in Director’s Cabin Sparks Row at Mumbai University’s Distance Education Centre