Contempt In, Criticism Out: The Supreme Court's NCERT Order and the Limits of Free Speech

Yash Jangrid | 24 March 2026 | The Wire

When the legislature restricts speech, courts can review it. When the executive does so, courts can strike it down. But when the Supreme Court itself adopts a speech-restrictive posture, constitutional remedies become limited. There is no appellate forum above it. Constitutional scholars often described this problem as an unchecked censorial power and it becomes particularly serious when the authority exercising it is the final judicial institution.

On March 11, a Supreme Court of India bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V.M. Pancholi, while hearing a suo motu petition concerning the Class 8 NCERT Social Science chapter “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society,”…

Click here to read the complete article

Previous
Previous

Maha Politicians Outraged After Maratha Empire Map Goes Missing from Hindi, Urdu Version of NCERT Std VIII Social Science Textbook

Next
Next

Touch Me Not — Is The NCERT Matter An Opportunity for The Court to Question Alleged Executive Interference in Curriculums?